Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov and civic activist Oleksandr Kolchenko in the courtroom (Image: The Moscow Times) |
Russian Court in
the city of Rostov-on-Don has sentenced Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov on
August 25 to 20 years in prison, accusing him in organizing and carrying out
terrorist attacks against Russian officer during Russian annexation of Crimea
in 2013. Oleg Sentsov’s co-defendant Oleksandr Kolchenko, prominent Ukrainian
Crimea based civic activist, was also declared guilty and accused of
participating in terrorist activity on the territory of Crimean Peninsula and
sentenced to 10 years in prison.
The accusations
of the Russian court lack evidence against the defendants, while the detainees
were also tortured during the process and investigation, what was documented by
their lawyers. The harsh verdict was strongly criticized by the lawyers, civil
rights and human rights activists and international community.
Here is the
report of Kyiv Post about the Tuesday’s court session and declaring the verdict.
Kyiv Post,
Allison Quinn – KYIV: A court in the Russian regional capital of Rostov-on-Don
handed down a crushing 20-year sentence in a maximum security prison to
Ukrainian Oleg Sentsov on Aug. 25 in a terrorism trial some see as revenge for
the filmmaker’s opposition to the Kremlin’s illegal annexation of Ukraine’s
Crimea.
Also in court
for sentencing was Alexander Kolchenko, a civic activist in Crimea, who was
sentenced to a 10-year term. Both men were accused of plotting terrorist acts
in Crimea following Russia’s illegal annexation of the peninsula and its
annexation via a sham referendum in March 2014.
The verdict
triggered an uproar among Russian journalists on social media, with many
pointing out how absurd it was for Sentsov to be found guilty while Yevgeniya
Vasilyeva, a former defense official in a massive corruption case, got out on
early release.
“On the same
day, Sentsov got 20 years and Vasilyeva was granted early release. And we, as
usual, will forget and, as usual, forgive,” wrote blogger and photographer
Mitya Aleshkovsky.
President Petro
Poroshenko immediately tweeted words of support. “Hang in there, Oleg. The time
will come when those who organized this against you will find themselves in the
prisoner's box,” Poroshenko wrote.
Sentsov and
Kolchenko seemed to have expected the verdict, however. They were seen laughing
as it was read out in the court room, according to a live broadcast of the
trial on Ukrainian television. Both men broke into song after the verdict,
singing the words “soul and body we will lay down for our freedom” from the
Ukrainian anthem.
Ukrainian filmmaker Oleg Sentsov (Image: CBC) |
According to
Russian prosecutors, Sentsov and Kolchenko were behind two small arson attacks
on the offices of Russian political party United Russia and the Russian
Community in Crimea civic organization in Simferopol on April 14 and April 18,
2014, respectively. Sentsov faced the heavier sentence because prosecutors said
he was the organizer of the attacks.
Sentsov has
maintained throughout his trial that the charges against him were fabricated.
He took part in Ukraine’s EuroMaidan public protests in late 2013 and early
2014, and was arrested last May while he was attending a pro-Ukrainian rally in
Crimea. He was then taken to Russia to stand trial.
Sentsov is the
most well-known of four Ukrainians arrested at that time – the others being
Kolchenko, Gennady Afanasyev, and Alexei Chirnigo. The four were accused by
Russia’s Federal Security Service of plotting to carry out terrorist attacks in
Crimea.
Afanasyev and
Chirnigo have already been sentenced to seven years in jail for terrorism, but
both have refused to testify in the cases against Sentsov and Kolchenko,
claiming via lawyers that they were tortured while in detention to extract
evidence.
Sentsov also
claimed earlier that he had been subjected to torture while in detention ahead
of his trial.
Before the Aug.
25 sentencing, Amnesty Ukraine media officer Bogdan Ovcharuk slammed the court
proceedings, saying that allegations that Sentsov had been tortured while in
detention hadn’t been properly investigated.
“The lack of
investigation into the torture (claim) is another manifestation of disregard
for the standards of a fair trial in this case,” Ovcharuk said.
Amnesty
International also says the trial itself is illegal, and the Ukrainians should
either be released or charged under Ukrainian law. It said that under
international law the removal or deportation of citizens of an occupied
territory is prohibited, and the criminal laws of the occupied country should
remain in force.
“Any (guilty
verdict) will be a loss for Russia, because the case against these Crimean
people is clearly fabricated to punish them for their opposition to the
occupation of Crimea,” Ovcharuk said.
No comments:
Post a Comment