Egyptian Shura Council (Upper House of the country’s Parliament) opens
today, on 25 May, the session to discuss the controversial judicial authority
law.
The amendments to the judicial law have been recently proposed by the
moderate Islamist Wasat Party and have been also supported by the Freedom and
Justice Party, which is the political wing of Muslim Brotherhood. But this law
was strongly criticizes by several opposition, liberal and leftist political
parties and powers and also met the critic of Judges Club, as this law is
considered being an attempt of the Muslim Brotherhood to monopolize all the key
sectors of power in the country including judiciary.
Though the session to discuss the amendments to the Judicial Authority
Law has been opened today despite the disagreements among the MPs on whether
this session should be open and when. Several representatives of Egypt’s opposition
refused to attend today’s Shura Council session protesting the controversial judicial
law.
I’d like to share here in my blog Ahram Online’s article with more
details regarding this issue. The article is published here.
Egypt's Shura Council discusses controversial judiciary law
Egypt's Islamist-led upper house of parliament opens discussion into
controversial amendments to the Judicial Authority Law; judges continue to
reject amendments, house speaker says discussion 'preliminary'
Ahram Online, Saturday 25 May 2013
Egypt's Shura Council begins discussion of the contentious Judicial
Authority Law Saturday amid disagreements among MPs on whether it is the right
time to do so.
Existing debate between MPs in the Islamist-dominated legislative body
prior to Saturday's session was mainly on whether the council should still go
ahead with the discussion while the presidency and the judiciary are in the
process of coordinating a "justice conference" — an initiative
adopted by President Morsi to reconcile with the judges. Part of the conference's
activities will be to establish the judges' vision on judicial authority law
amendments and prepare a draft the president said he would submit to the Shura
Council himself for review.
For his part, speaker of the Shura Council Ahmed Fahmi said that
Saturday's session would only be "preliminary" and tackle details of
the proposal, adding that if the council approves referral of the amendments to
the Legislative Committee, the latter will then begin a series of discussions
in which judges will engage.
The proposed amendments to the Judicial Authority Law, presented in
April by the moderate Islamist Wasat Party and endorsed by the Muslim
Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party, caused uproar among judges in the
ongoing crisis between the judiciary and Islamists.
The proposed bill reduces the retirement age for judges from 70 to 60,
which would effectively pension off about a quarter of Egypt's 13,000 serving
judges.
MPs who proposed the law argue that the retirement age was gradually
increased from 60 to 70 during the rule of ousted president Hosni Mubarak, in
order to prolong the terms of those judges loyal to the former regime.
A number of leftist and liberal MPs have boycotted Saturday's Shura
Council session.
The months-long standoff between Egypt's presidency and the judiciary
began in earnest in November, when Morsi issued a decree sacking Mubarak-era
Prosecutor General Abdel-Meguid Mahmoud and replacing him with Judge Talaat
Abdullah.
The move prompted uproar among much of the judiciary, with a number of
judges accusing Morsi of infringing on judicial independence. According to
Egyptian law, they argued, the Supreme Judicial Council is the only entity with
the right to appoint a new prosecutor general.
On 19 April, the Muslim Brotherhood organised a Friday rally to demand a
"purge" of Egypt's judiciary, in a move that some analysts feared
would further damage the group's relations with the nation's judges. Opposition
activists from the National Salvation Front organized a symbolic demonstration
in front of the Shura Council on Saturday afternoon, during the session, to
protest the bill.
No comments:
Post a Comment